RESUMO
INTRODUÇÃO: A osteoartrite (OA) de joelho normalmente ocasiona dificuldades na realização de diversas atividades rotineiras, sendo um dos principais motivos de procura por serviços médicos e fisioterapêuticos. Existem diversas modalidades de tratamento, com resultados variados. A utilização da joelheira como recurso adjunto tem-se mostrado controversa na literatura. OBJETIVO: Analisar a eficácia imediata da joelheira elástica na dor e na capacidade funcional em indivíduos com OA de joelho. MÉTODOS: Foram analisados 74 sujeitos sintomáticos (132 joelhos) com OA de joelho por meio dos testes Stair Climb Power Test (SCPT), Timed Up and Go (TUG) e Caminhada de 8 Metros (C8M), além da escala visual analógica (EVA) para dor. Os testes foram realizados com e sem joelheira; a ordem e a presença ou ausência das joelheiras durante os testes foram randomizadas e com avaliador cego. RESULTADOS: Foi encontrada diferença estatisticamente significante entre as duas situações comparadas (com e sem joelheira) para EVA (P < 0,001), mostrando redução da dor com a joelheira. Análises com os três testes funcionais em ambas as condições foram realizadas, resultando diferenças estatisticamente significantes para os testes C8M e TUG (P < 0,05), mas não no SCPT (P > 0,1339). CONCLUSÃO: A joelheira elástica foi eficiente na melhora imediata da capacidade funcional e da dor em indivíduos com OA de joelho, pois melhorou o desempenho durante os testes propostos. Sendo assim, entende-se que se trata de um recurso coadjuvante para o tratamento da OAJ por ser prático, útil, de fácil emprego clínico e que pode auxiliar e/ou facilitar a realização de exercícios terapêuticos.
BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is one of the major reasons for seeking medical and physical therapy services, because it usually causes difficulties in performing daily life activities. There are several types of treatment, with varied results. The use of knee sleeve as an adjuvant resource has been controversial in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To assess the immediate efficacy of elastic knee sleeve on pain and functional capacity of individuals with KOA. METHODS: Seventy-four patients (132 knees) with symptomatic KOA were assessed by use of the Stair Climb Power Test (SCPT), Timed Up and Go (TUG) and 8-Meter Walk (8MW) tests, in addition to the VAS for pain. The tests were performed with and without knee sleeves, with a cover on the knees to hide knee sleeve. The order and the presence of the knee sleeve were randomized, and the investigator was blind. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was found between the two compared circumstances (with and without knee sleeve) when using the VAS (P < 0.001), which showed a reduction in pain with the knee sleeve use. Analyses of the three functional tests under both circumstances were performed, resulting in statistically significant differences in 8MW and TUG tests (P < 0.05), but not in SCPT (P > 0.1339). CONCLUSION: The elastic knee sleeve proved to be effective to immediately improve the functional capacity and pain of individuals with KOA, because it enhanced performance during the tests proposed. Thus, the knee sleeve is an adjuvant resource for treating KOA, because it is practical, useful, and of easy clinical use, and can aid in the practice of therapeutic exercises.
Assuntos
Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Bandagens , Osteoartrite do Joelho/terapia , Método Simples-Cego , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is one of the major reasons for seeking medical and physical therapy services, because it usually causes difficulties in performing daily life activities. There are several types of treatment, with varied results. The use of knee sleeve as an adjuvant resource has been controversial in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To assess the immediate efficacy of elastic knee sleeve on pain and functional capacity of individuals with KOA. METHODS: Seventy-four patients (132 knees) with symptomatic KOA were assessed by use of the Stair Climb Power Test (SCPT), Timed Up and Go (TUG) and 8-Meter Walk (8MW) tests, in addition to the VAS for pain. The tests were performed with and without knee sleeves, with a cover on the knees to hide knee sleeve. The order and the presence of the knee sleeve were randomized, and the investigator was blind. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was found between the two compared circumstances (with and without knee sleeve) when using the VAS (P < 0.001), which showed a reduction in pain with the knee sleeve use. Analyses of the three functional tests under both circumstances were performed, resulting in statistically significant differences in 8MW and TUG tests (P < 0.05), but not in SCPT (P > 0.1339). CONCLUSION: The elastic knee sleeve proved to be effective to immediately improve the functional capacity and pain of individuals with KOA, because it enhanced performance during the tests proposed. Thus, the knee sleeve is an adjuvant resource for treating KOA, because it is practical, useful, and of easy clinical use, and can aid in the practice of therapeutic exercises.
Assuntos
Bandagens , Osteoartrite do Joelho/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Método Simples-Cego , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Objetivo: Avaliar a eficácia das diferentes técnicas de bandagens adesivas rígidas (BAR) na melhora da sensibilidade proprioceptiva do pé e tornozelo. Métodos: Uma busca sistematizada foi realizada nas bases de dados: BioMed Central Gateway, BIREME, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, LILACS, MEDLINE, PEDro, SCIELO. Foram revisados somente ensaios clínicos randomizados. Resultados: Três estudos foram selecionados. A técnica Gibney basket weave foi eficaz na melhora do sistema sensório-motor, mas a técnica de Mulligan e a associação três técnicas (estribosde tornozelo, travamento de calcâneo e figura em 6) não se mostraram eficazes. Conclusão: Não há evidências sobre qual a melhor BAR na melhora da propriocepção
Objective: To Evaluate the effectivenessof different techniques of rigidadhesive bandages in improvement ofproprioceptive sensibility of the foot andankle. Methods: A systematic searchwas performed in the electronic databases:BioMed Central Gateway, Bireme,CINAHL, Cochrane library, LILACS,MEDLINE, PEDro, SCIELO. We reviewedonly randomized clinical trials.Results: Three studies were reviewed.The Gibney basket weave technique iseffective in improving the sensory-motorsystem, but the Mulligan techniqueand the association of three techniques(ankle stirrups, ankle lock and figure of6) didnt show to be effective. Conclusion:There is no evidence about the bestBAR in the improvement of proprioception.
